INFLUENCE OF THE ROTARY AND CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE FOR PULPECTOMIES IN THE OPERATIONAL TIME AND ANXIETY OF PRESCHOOLERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31984/oactiva.v3i3.268Keywords:
Pulpectomy, prescholers, Molars deciduous, Rotary instrumentationAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare two techniques of instrumentation for pulpectomies, called rotatory and conventional, on the operating time and anxiety of preschoolers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was quasi-experimental, longitudinal cut. Two study groups were selected, with 20 preschools each, who had informed consent and assent. To establish possible differences between the values obtained, the Student's T and Square Chi tests of Mc Nemar were used. RESULTS: The operative time in the pulpectomies of deciduous molars was 31.95 min (1.54) for the rotary instrumentation, and 48.35 min (2.48) for the conventional instrumentation. The heart rate of the preschoolers varied from 70.65 beats per minute (LPM) (3.36); during the rotary instrumentation, at 85.30 (3.94); during conventional instrumentation. On the other hand, the oxygen saturation of the children did not vary significantly being 91.55% (0.89) during the rotary instrumentation and of 91.70% (1.26) during the conventional instrumentation. CONCLUSION: The differences registered in the relationship with the opereatorio time and anxiety of preschool children subjected to two types of instrumentation techniques (rotatory and conventional), for molare deciduous pulpectomies, are statistically significant (95% CI, p <0.001).
Downloads
References
Red de Salud Puno. Morbilidad general por grupos deenfermedad: Red Puno; 2015 [citado 13 Abril 2015].
Ministerio de Salud. Plan Nacional Bicentenario el Perúhacia el 2021, aprobado por el Acuerdo Nacional. 2011.
Kuo, C., Wang, Y., Chang, H., Huang, G., Lin, C., Li, U.Application of Ni-Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primarymolars. J Dent SciVolume 1, Pages 10-15
Ochoa T, Mendez V, Martínez A y Pozos A. Instrumenta-ción rotatoria en dientes temporales. Reporte de un caso.Odontol Pediatr. 2011;10:(1)51-54.
Crespo S., Cortes O., Garcia C., Perez L. Comparison bet-ween rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J.Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2008;32:295–298.
Sageena George, S. Anandaraj, Jyoti S. Issac, Sheen A.John, Anoop Harris. Rotary endodontics in primary teeth– A review. The Saudi Dental Journal (2016) 28,12–17.
Sarnat H. Arad P. Hanauer D. Shohami E.Communicationstrategies used during pediatric dental treatment: a pi-lot study. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry.2001:23:3.
Hülsmann M, Herbst U, Schäfers F. Comparative study ofroot-canal preparation using Lightspeed and Quantec SCrotary NiTi instruments. International Endodontic Journal.Volume 36, Issue 11 November 2003 Pages 748–756
Villena H. Terapia Pulpar. Primera edición: Lima Perú;Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. 2001.
Porto A, Ramos A, Simionatto C, Rivas JC, Filho I. Eva-luación de la instrumentación de conductos radiculares conlimas manuales y rotatorias de níquel-titanio aspecto mor-fológico de las limas antes y después. Acta OdontológicaVenezolana. 2008; 46(3):278-283.
Crespo S., Cortes O., Garcia C., Perez L. Comparison bet-ween rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J.Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2008;32:295–298. [PubMed]
Katge F., Patil D., Poojari M., Pimpale J., Shitoot A., Ru-sawat B. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaningefficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reci-procating systems in primary teeth: an vitro study. J. IndianSoc. Pedod. Prev. Dent. 2014;32:311–316. [PubMed]
Kummer T.R., Calvo M.C., Cordeiro M.M., de Sousa VieiraR., de Carvalho Rocha M.J. Ex vivo study of manual androtary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.2008;105:84–92. [PubMed]
Musale P.K., Mujawar S.A. Evaluation of the efficacy ofrotary versus hand files in root canal preparation of pri-mary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent.2014;15:113–120. [PubMed]
Francinne M. R., Modesto A., Faraco I.M. Manual androtary instrumentation techniquesfor root canal preparation.DENTISTRY 3000. 2014;2(1)
Azar MR, Mokhtare M. Rotary Mtwo system versus manualK-file instruments: Efficacy in preparing primary and per-manent molar root canals. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:363
Azar MR, Safi L, Nikaein A. Comparison of the cleaningcapacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and ma-nual instruments in primary teeth. Dental Research Journal.2012;9(2):146-151.
Arregui M, Guinot F, Sáez S, Bellet LJ. Instrumentaciónmecánica en dentición temporal. ODONTOL PEDIÁTR.Madrid. 2005;13(3):102-107.
Klingberg G y Broberg A. Dental fear/anxiety and dentalbehavior management problems in children and adoles-cents: a review of prevalence and concomitant psychologi-cal factors. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(6):391-406.
Gamponia M, Yugar F, Babaali H, Gilman R. Valores dereferencia para pulsoximetría en la altura. Archivos delHospital La Paz. 2004. Mayo, 1(1)
Mejía H y Mejía M. Oximetría de pulso. Rev. bol. ped.[Internet]. 2012 [citado 2016 Mar 05];51(2):149-155.
Downloads
Published
- Abstract 1423
- DESCARGAR PDF (Español (España)) 1912
- ABRIR HTML (Español (España)) 253
- AUDIO DEL RESUMEN (Español (España)) 89
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Se autoriza la reproducción total y parcial, y la citación del material que aparece en la revista, siempre y cuando se indique de manera explícita: nombre de la revista, nombre del autor(es), año, volumen, número y páginas del artículo fuente. Las ideas y afirmaciones consignadas por los autores están bajo su responsabilidad y no interpretan necesariamente las opiniones y políticas del Consejo Editorial de la Revista OActiva ni de la Universidad Católica de Cuenca.
La Revista OActiva utiliza la Licencia Creative Commons de Reconocimeinto-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0, que es la siguiente: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Internacional.
