Perception of criteria for use, selection and cementation ofintrarradicular posts in post endodontic rehabilitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31984/oactiva.v5i2.464Abstract
Aim:To evaluate the perception of knowledge and clinical experience, and obtain scientific and documented information onthe criteria used in the high Andean region of Peru in post-endodontic rehabilitation.Material and methods:A cross-sectionalstudy was conducted using a validated instrument with a population of dentists (n = 100) in the city of Juliaca-Peru, previouslycarrying out a pilot test with 20% of the population. Variables such as dental criteria and intraradicular posts criteria weremeasured. Descriptive statistics and the chi-squared test were used (inferential statistics for qualitative variables).Results:68.8% use the cast posts according to the way of obtaining and the material, 93.6% always use cast posts in the absence ofremaining coronal structure; 61% consider the splinting effect of 2mm prior to rehabilitation; for 53% the cost influenceswhen choosing the treatment; 78% are unaware of other post-endodontic rehabilitation systems. The cementing system for thecast posts is the 57.8% glass ionomer, and for the fiberglass poles the 57.8% dual cement. In all cases p <0.05 was consideredsignificant.Conclusions:The criteria evaluated have great scientific validity since they provide the level of knowledge thatthe Andean population handles in relation to different studies worldwide.
Downloads
References
Rubio J, Zarzosa JI, Pallarés A. A comparative study ofshaping ability of four rotary systems. Acta Stomatol Croat.2015;49(4):285-93.3
Monterde M, Pallarés A, C Cabanillas, Zarzosa I, VictoriaA. A Comparative in Vitro Study of Apical Microleakagewith Five Obturation Techniques: Lateral Condensation,Soft-CoreR©, Obtura IIR©, GuttaflowR©and ResilonR©. ActaStomatol Croat. 2014;48(2):123-31.4
Ozbay G, B Kitiki, Peker S, Kargul B. Apical SealingAbility of a Novel Material: Analysis by Fluid FiltrationTechnique. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2014;48(2):132-95 Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS, et al. Impact of the qualityof coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillingson success of root canal treatment: a systematic review andmeta-analysis. J Endod. 2011;37(7):895-902.6
Christensen GJ. Intracoronal and extracoronal tooth restora-tions 1999. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130(4):557-60.7
Coelho MDSC, Biffi JCG, Da Silva GR, Abrahão A, Cam-pos RE, Soares CJ . Finite element analysis of weakenedroots restored with composite resin and posts. Dent Mater J.2009;28(6):671-8.8
Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical consi-derations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth:a systematic review of the literature. Part II (Evaluation offatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int 2008;39:117–29.9
Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restorationof endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod.2004;30:289–301.10
Horn SD, Gassaway J. Practice-based evidence study de-sign for comparative effectiveness research. Med Care.2007;45(10):50-7.11
Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Loomans BA, Bronkhorst EM.Sevenyear clinical evaluation of painful cracked teeth restored with a direct composite restoration. J Endod.2008;34(7):808-11.
Gilbert GH, Richman JS, Gordan VV, et al. DPBRNCollaborative Group. Lessons learned during the conductof clinical studies in the dental PBRN. J Dent Educ.2011;75(4):453-65
Murgueitio R. Classification of the extension defectsof endodontically treated posterior teeth. Rev Estomat.2008;16(2):31-37.
Ahmed SN, Donovan TE, Ghuman T. Survey of dentists todetermine contemporary use of endodontic posts. J ProsthetDent. 2017;117(5):642-55.
Sarkis-Onofre R, Pereira-Cenci T, Opdam NJ, Demarco FF.Preference for using posts to restore endodontically treatedteeth: findings from a survey with dentists. Braz Oral Res.2015;29:1-6.
Bolla M, Muller-Bolla M, Borg C, Lupi-Pegurier L, Laplan-che O, Leforestier E. WITHDRAWN: Root canal posts forthe restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane Database SystRev. 2016;11(11):CD004623.
Kon M, Zitzmann NU, Weiger R, Krastl G. Postendodonticrestoration: a survey among dentists in Switzerland. Sch-weiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2013;123(12):1076-88.
Trushkowsky RD. Restoration of endodontically treatedteeth: criteria and technique considerations. QuintessenceInt. 2014;45(7):557-67.
Naumann M, Neuhaus KW, Kölpin M, Seemann R. Why,when, and how general practitioners restore endodonticallytreated teeth: a representative survey in Germany. Clin OralInvestig. 2016;20(2):253-9.
Silva NR, Raposo LH, Versluis A, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Soa-res CJ. The effect of post, core, crown type, and ferrule pre-sence on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically trea-ted bovine anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(5):306-17.
Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resincements-Chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. JOral Rehabil. 2011:38(4);295-14.
Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR,Pereira-Cenci T. The role of resin cement on bond strengthof glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent.2014; 39(1):31-44.
Published
- Abstract 1281
- PDF (Español (España)) 1340
- HTML (Español (España)) 100
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Se autoriza la reproducción total y parcial, y la citación del material que aparece en la revista, siempre y cuando se indique de manera explícita: nombre de la revista, nombre del autor(es), año, volumen, número y páginas del artículo fuente. Las ideas y afirmaciones consignadas por los autores están bajo su responsabilidad y no interpretan necesariamente las opiniones y políticas del Consejo Editorial de la Revista OActiva ni de la Universidad Católica de Cuenca.
La Revista OActiva utiliza la Licencia Creative Commons de Reconocimeinto-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0, que es la siguiente: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Internacional.
