Efficacy of mucogingival surgery after removal of a pyogenic granuloma: a case report.

Authors

  • Gabriela Pereira-Heredia PRÁCTICA PRIVADA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31984/oactiva.v6i1.535

Keywords:

Granuloma, flap, connective tissue, gingiva, esthetic

Abstract

The objective of this article is to demonstrate the effectiveness of mucogingival surgery as a function of the coronal position flap in the root coverage, as an adjunct treatment in the surgical removal of a pyogenic granuloma that is close to the marginal gingiva of the anterior superior dental organs. Pyogenic granuloma is a hyperplastic and inflammatory lesion that occurs in any area of ​​the oral mucosa and originates from the connective tissue of the periosteum or the periodontal membrane. To restore the residual defect formed by the removal of said granuloma, a coronally positioned flap was made in combination with a graft of subepithelial connective tissue obtained from the tuberosity of the maxilla, in order to generate an increase in the keratinized gingiva, provide similarity in the color and texture recovery of the treated area. This results in volume in the gingival tissue and adequate aesthetics at the gum level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rebattú y González MG, Piña Ramírez CE, Sánchez Obre-gón JM. Granuloma piógeno de localización atípica: reporte de un caso. Revista ADM.2017;74(4).

Castillo Castillo A, Doncel Pérez C. Granuloma Piógeno.Presentación de un caso. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas. 2013;12(3):322-328.

Neville B, Damm D, Allen C.Patología oral e maxilofa-cial.Editora Guanabara Koogan;1998.

Cárdenas JLR, Vásquez ZT. Granuloma Piogeno Oral. Re-vista Experiencia en Medicina del Hospital Regional Lam-bayeque. 2018;4(1):24-27.

Soto A RAMV. Clasificación de enfermedades periodonta-les. revista Mexicana de periodontología. 2018 agosto; 9(1-2).

Gadea Rosa C, Cartagena Lay A, Cáceres La Torre A.Diagnóstico y tratamiento del granuloma piógeno oral: seriede casos. Revista odontológica mexicana. 2017:21(4):253-261.

De Sanctis M,Zucchelli G. Coronally advanced flap:a modified surgical approach for isolated recession-type defects: Three-year results. Journal of clinicalperiondontology.2007;34(3):262-268.

Diaz Caballero A, ARcila Aristizabal T, Arrieta González L. Injerto de tejido conectivo subpediculado y colgajo deavance coronal para el tratamiento de una recesión gingi-val en paciente con tratamiento de ortodoncia: Presenta-ción de un caso. Avances en Periodoncia e ImplantologíaOral.2009:2(2):71-74.

Cairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, Mervelt J, Pagliaro U.The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival rescessions and predict root coverage outcomes:an explorative an reliability study. Journal of clinicalperiodontology.2011;38(7):661-666.

Zucchelli G, Clauser C, De Sanctis M, Calandriello M.Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration proceduresin the treatment of deep recession type defects. Journal ofperiodontology.1998;69(2):138-145.

Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M. The addition of soft tisue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant sur-gery: critical elements in desing and execution. Journal of clinical periodontology.2014;41:S123-S142.

Wachtel H, Ficki S, Zuhr O, Huerzeler MB. The Double-Sling Suture: A Modified Technique for Primary WoundClosure. European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2006;1(4).

Jafarzadeh H, Snatkhani M, Mohtasham N. Oralpyogenicgranuloma:areview.Journaloforalsciencie.2006;48(4):167-175.

Asha V, Dhanya M, Patil BA, Revanna G. An unusual presentation of pyogenic granuloma of the lower lip. Con-temporary clinical dentistry. 2014;5(4):524.

Pick RM, Colvard MD. Current status of lasers in soft tissue dental surgery. Journal of periodontology.1993;64(7):589-602.

Published

2020-12-30
ESTADISTICAS
  • Abstract 415
  • PDF (Español (España)) 463
  • HTML (Español (España)) 54

How to Cite

Pereira-Heredia, G. (2020). Efficacy of mucogingival surgery after removal of a pyogenic granuloma: a case report. Odontología Activa Revista Científica, 6(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.31984/oactiva.v6i1.535