Direct cementation protocol in Orthodontics, a look at the future of bonding: A compilation of modern literature.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31984/oactiva.v7iEsp..828Keywords:
Keywords: Dental Enamel, Orthodontic, Appliances, Fixed, Orthodontics, Clinical Protocols (DeCS).Abstract
Abstract
The cementation of fixed appliances is a practice that will endure in orthodontists throughout history, where it becomes independent of the chosen philosophy or the characteristics of the bracket to be used. Objective: To construct a review of the literature on the information currently available on the protocol of direct cementation in orthodontics, focusing on the previous conditioning, its times, attachments or supplies, type of adhesion, and a possible new protocol to guarantee the bracket-tooth bonding. Materials and Methods: A thorough search was carried out and this was a descriptive, retrospective research with a documentary design. A total of 454 scientific articles were found in reputable verified sources such as: PudMed, LILACS, SAGE Journals, CORE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Oxford Academia, Scielo, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, with a search strategy included the use of equations and Boolean operators such as: orthodontic bonding AND adhesion AND enamel AND protocol AND Brackets completely related to the direct cementation protocol. Results: After reviewing the title, abstract and exclusion in duplicate, a total of 88 articles were selected, and after a complete reading and filtering by inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 9 articles were evaluated, which were part of the following review due to their great research value. Conclusions: few in-vivo investigations of the whole direct cementation protocol were found, the review of a simple but valuable protocol was carried out, where the conditioning, the adhesion system and the polymerization times make up a tripod in the stability of the bracket for biomechanics.
Downloads
References
Wang CH, Randazzo L. Evolution of imaging and management systems in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 ;149(6):798-805. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.016.
Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Szatkiewicz T, Tomkowski R, Tandecka K, Grocholewicz K. Effect of orthodontic debonding and adhesive removal on the enamel - current knowledge and future perspectives - a systematic review. Med Sci Monit. 2014 ; 20:1991-2001. Doi: 10.12659/MSM.890912.
Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70(6):435-41. Doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0435:TEORBO>2.0.CO;2.
Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod. 1998; 25(4):283-7. Doi: 10.1093/ortho/25.4.283.
Roelofs T, Merkens N, Roelofs J, Bronkhorst E, Breuning H. A retrospective survey of the causes of bracket- and tube-bonding failures. Angle Orthod. 2017; 87(1):111-117. Doi: 10.2319/021616-136.1.
Bellini H, Moyano J, Gil J, Puigdollers A. Comparison of the superelasticity of different nickel-titanium orthodontic archwires and the loss of their properties by heat treatment. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016; 27(10):158. Doi: 10.1007/s10856-016-5767-5.
Oz AA, Oz AZ, Arici S. In-vitro bond strengths and clinical failure rates of metal brackets bonded with different light-emitting diode units and curing times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149(2):212-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.036.
Dominguez GC, Tortamano A, Lopes LV, Catharino PC, Morea C. A comparative clinical study of the failure rate of orthodontic brackets bonded with two adhesive systems: conventional and self-etching primer (SEP). Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18(2):55-60. Doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000200014.
Noble J, Karaiskos NE, Wiltshire WA. In vivo bonding of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel using an adhesion promotor. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(2):357-60. doi: 10.2319/020207-53.1.
Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(26):3757-85. Doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044.
Miles P. Indirect bonding--do custom bases need a plastic conditioner? A randomised clinical trial. Aust Orthod J. 2010;26(2):109-12.
Mohammed RE, Abass S, Abubakr NH, Mohammed ZM. Comparing orthodontic bond failures of light-cured composite resin with chemical-cured composite resin: A 12-month clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 150(2):290-4. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.013.
Esteves CM, Ota-Tsuzuki C, Reis AF, Rodrigues JA. Antibacterial activity of various self-etching adhesive systems against oral streptococci. Oper Dent. 2010; 35(4):448-53. Doi: 10.2341/09-297-L.
Yadala C, Gaddam R, Arya S, Baburamreddy KV, Raju VR, Varma PK. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-etching Adhesives: An In-Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2015 ;7(7):53-7.
Ibrahim AI, Thompson VP, Deb S. A Novel Etchant System for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9579. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45980-9.
Hu H, Li C, Li F, Chen J, Sun J, Zou S. Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013; 11:16. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005516.pub2.
Lowder PD, Foley T, Banting DW. Bond strength of 4 orthodontic adhesives used with a caries-protective resin sealant .Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 agosto; 134 (2): 291-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.002
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. Estado del arte de los adhesivos de autograbado. Abolladura Mater. 2011; 27 :17–28. Finnema KJ, Özcan M, Post WJ, Ren Y, Dijkstra PU. Pruebas de resistencia de unión de ortodoncia in vitro: una revisión sistemática y un metanálisis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137 :615–22.
Pinto CM, Ferreira JT, Matsumoto MA, Borsatto MC, Silva RA, Romano FL. Evaluation of different LED light-curing devices for bonding metallic orthodontic brackets Braz Dent J. 2011;22(3):249-53. DOI : 10.1590/S0103-64402011000300012
McCusker N, Lee SM, Robinson S, Patel N, Sandy JR, Irlanda AJ. Light curing in orthodontics; Should we be concerned? ? Abolladura Mater. 2013 junio; 29 (6): e85-90. DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.023. Ward JD, Wolf BJ, Leite LP, Zhou J. Clinical effect of reducing curing times with high-intensity LED lights Ángulo ortodoxo. 2015 noviembre;85(6):1064-9. DOI:10.2319/080714-556.1
» https://doi.org/10.2319/080714-556.1
Pandis N, Strigou S, Eliades T .Long-term Failure Rate of Brackets Bonded with Plasma and High-intensity Light-emitting Diode Curing Lights: A Clinical Assessment. Ángulo ortodoxo. 2007 julio; 77 (4): 707-10. DOI: 10.2319/062106-253
» https://doi.org/10.2319/062106-253
Zope A, Zope-Khalekar Y, Chitko SS, Kerudi VV, Patil HA, Bonde PV, et al. Comparación de primers de autograbado con sistema de grabado ácido convencional en brackets de ortodoncia. J Clin Diagnóstico Res. 2016; 10 :ZC19–22.
Lamper T, Ilie N, Huth K, Rudzki I, Wichelhaus A, Paschos E. Adhesivos de autograbado para la unión de brackets de ortodoncia: ¿más rápido, más fuerte, más seguro? Clin Oral Invest. 2014; 18 :313–9.
Øgaard B, Fjeld M. The enamel surface and bonding in orthodontics. Ortodoncia Semin. 2010; 16 :37–48.
Scougall Vilchis RJ, Yamamoto S, Kitai N, Yamamoto K. Fuerza
de unión al cizallamiento de los brackets de ortodoncia unidos con diferentes adhesivos de autograbado. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136 :425.
Fleming PS, Johal A, Pandis N. Self-etch primers and conventional acid-etch technique for orthodontic bonding: A systematic review and meta-analysisAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 142 :83–94.
Lamper T, Ilie N, Huth K, Rudzki I, Wichelhaus A, Paschos E. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives. Clin Oral Invest. 2014; 18 :313–9. DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024
Scougall Vilchis RJ, Yamamoto S, Kitai N, Yamamoto K. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives. . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136 :425–30 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024
Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Yamamoto K. Effects of 6 self-etching primers on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135 :424.e1–424. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.016
Legler LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on enamel depth of etch: An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 98 :154–160. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70009-2
Hintz JK, Bradley TG, Eliades T. Cambios de color del esmalte después del blanqueamiento con peróxido de carbamida al 10 %: una comparación de dientes unidos/desunidos con ortodoncia y dientes no tratados. Ortodoncia Eur J. 2001; 23 :411–415.
Downloads
Published
- Abstract 599
- DESCARGAR EN PDF (Español (España)) 332
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Odontología Activa Revista Científica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Se autoriza la reproducción total y parcial, y la citación del material que aparece en la revista, siempre y cuando se indique de manera explícita: nombre de la revista, nombre del autor(es), año, volumen, número y páginas del artículo fuente. Las ideas y afirmaciones consignadas por los autores están bajo su responsabilidad y no interpretan necesariamente las opiniones y políticas del Consejo Editorial de la Revista OActiva ni de la Universidad Católica de Cuenca.
La Revista OActiva utiliza la Licencia Creative Commons de Reconocimeinto-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0, que es la siguiente: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Internacional.
